Should 0bama have sanctioned BP for its extensive business partnerships with Iran?

http://www.newsmax.com/KenTimmerman/BP-Iran-sanctions-spill/2010/06/22/id/362755

Iran’s joint ventures with BP and a host of other international oil firms now should be included in new Iran sanctions legislation, says Mark Dubowitz, executive director of the foundation.

“If Washington doesn’t close this loophole, Iran could soon be a partner in energy projects off our own shores,” he was quoted as saying in Time magazine last week.

But the legislation that finally cleared a House-Senate conference committee on Monday said nothing about joint ventures.

BP doesn’t trumpet its ongoing business with Iran in its statutory reporting to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

“BP has interests in, and is the operator of, two fields and a pipeline located outside Iran in which the National Iranian Oil Company and an affiliated entity have interest,” the company stated.

The Obama White House could sanction BP for its investments in Iran’s oil and gas sector today under existing legislation, if it decided to do so.

The law allows the president to ban companies that have invested more than $20 million in Iranian energy projects from doing business with the U.S. government or buying U.S. technology. But so far, no president has applied those sanctions.

BP clearly is watching to see what Congress will do.

In its SEC filings, BP revealed that it “restructured” its interest in the joint ventures with Iran and is maintaining its involvement in these projects “through certain contractual arrangements, which it keeps under review in light of pending legislative developments in the US.”

That language may strike many U.S. legislators as cynical and could backfire as badly as BP Chairman Carl-Henric Svanberg’s comment last week that the company cared about the “small people” the Gulf of Mexico oil spill hurt.

He should, but he will not. BP also helped him with his engineered oil spill to pass his cap and trade tax

Related Articles: